Your browser does not appear to support JavaScript. You may want to try one of the following:
You may want to try one of the following:
If the above does not work, try reloading the page yourself. Note that you will lose any unsaved changes:
shift
control
Show details
Hide details
This form has to be reloaded. This most likely happened because your session has expired, which might take to the login page. (If you think that you shouldn't see this message and that the problem persists, please contact support.)
In IHE PCC TF2 (revision 11.0), p.187, the dose (doseQuantity) and rate (rateQuantity) are defined by their low and high bounds that are different if a range is given, or equal otherwise (<doseQuantity><low value='' unit=''/><high value='' unit=''/></doseQuantity). In IHE PHARM PRE (revision 1.9), pp.47-48, they are only defined by their value and unit (<doseQuantity value='' unit=''/>).In IHE PCC CDA (revision 2.6), p.141 and p.144, low+high is given in the definition and @value + @unit is shown in the example.The two standards disagree on the correct structure, Stéphane is investigating why PHARM is not following PCC here.In any case, the rateQuantity and doseQuantity IVL_PQ structure should be restrained to either @value + @unit or low + high. The examples that show a doseQuantity with a center are wrong for both PHARM and PCC.I guess the same correction should be applied to the template Dosage Instructions Dosage Change.-
Wait for IHE guidance on this, then constrain both rateQuantity and doseQuantity to the chosen structure.-
-