Help
Login
Busy
Search
International Patient Summary (IPS) - Templates

 
Template locked

OK Not OK
Templates (External repositories)

Warning Ok
Warning
Filter
true50
IPS Radiology Result Observation
false
History (16)
Date Author Status Type
2018-03-12 11:13:42 Dr. Kai Heitmann Draft version
2018-02-20 17:41:34 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-12-14 11:05:51 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-12-12 19:34:55 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-12-12 19:31:53 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-12-12 19:15:42 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-12-10 14:51:35 François Macary Draft version
2017-12-10 13:38:32 François Macary Draft version
2017-12-10 13:37:40 François Macary Draft version
2017-12-08 18:32:14 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-11-09 16:00:43 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-11-09 15:55:34 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-11-09 15:53:51 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-11-09 15:38:13 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-10-18 16:26:21 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
2017-07-21 09:16:41 Giorgio Cangioli Draft version
false
Issues (4)
false
Request for Information/Education Status = Closed ( hl7ips-issue-44 ): Results organizer (and included obs) code binding
Type Request for Information/Education Status Request for Information/Education Status = Closed Priority Low
Current Labels
 
 (CDA) CDA Implementation 
 
 (Vocab) Vocabularies 
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-05-23 20:01:06 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 CDA 
 
 Vocab 
Description
All the bindings have been added
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-05-10 15:44:27 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 CDA 
 
 Vocab 
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-05-02 11:29:39 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 CDA 
Description
Finding:

Two questions:

  1. should we define a value set for the organzier code or the full LOINC code system is the right one ? The same question applies to any of the included observation (lab, rad,..)
  2. should we harmonize the way the binding is expressed (in this case codesystem fixed to LOINC; or a voc binding with a value set that is the full LOINC code system))  ?
Suggestion:

-

Further explanation:

-

Request for Information/Education Status = Closed ( hl7ips-issue-49 ): results observation: choice for the <value>
Type Request for Information/Education Status Request for Information/Education Status = Closed Priority Normal
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-06-07 16:30:53 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
Description
included a choice for the observation.values
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-05-02 12:11:41 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
Description
Finding:

Consider to change (or integrate) the constraint "If Observation/value is a physical quantity (xsi:type="PQ"), the unit of measure SHALL be selected from ValueSet UnitsOfMeasureCaseSensitive 2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.12839 DYNAMIC"
 
into a choice PQ / other data types (if feasible)
define the VS binding explicitly for the PS data type

Suggestion:

-

Further explanation:

-

Change Request Status = Closed ( hl7ips-issue-50 ): VS binding missing for methodCode and targetSiteCode
Type Change Request Status Change Request Status = Closed Priority Normal
Current Labels
 
 (Vocab) Vocabularies 
 
 (STU1Ballot) STU1 Ballot 
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-10-30 18:44:14 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 Vocab 
 
 STU1Ballot 
Description
Decision taken during the 2017-10-11 call

targetSiteCode: to be removed form Lab and Pathology results. (Giorgio to update the excel file).

methodCode: to be removed results observations / procedure

approachSiteCode: to be removed procedure

targetSiteCode: intensional SCT based value set; preferred value set; not part of the request for free.for-use set… (all descendants of 442083009 |Anatomical or acquired body structure (body structure))

Tracking / Status = Open 2017-09-01 16:18:06 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 Vocab 
 
 STU1Ballot 
Description
reported as ballot comment
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-05-02 12:15:14 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 Vocab 
Description
Finding:

Define and add a value set for the methodCode and  targetSiteCode coded elements

Suggestion:

-

Further explanation:

-

Change Request Status = Closed ( hl7ips-issue-51 ): result observation: full SCT binding
Type Change Request Status Change Request Status = Closed Priority Normal
Current Labels
 
 (Vocab) Vocabularies 
 
 (CDA) CDA Implementation 
 
 (TBD) To be discussed 
 
 (STU1Ballot) STU1 Ballot 
Events
Tracking / Status = Closed 2017-11-15 10:10:52 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 Vocab 
 
 CDA 
 
 TBD 
 
 STU1Ballot 
Description
All the bindings issue related to the  targetSiteCode; methodCode; and so on have been fixed.
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-09-01 16:16:43 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 Vocab 
 
 CDA 
 
 TBD 
 
 STU1Ballot 
Description
reported as ballot comment
Tracking / Status = Open 2017-05-02 12:27:24 : Tracking by Giorgio Cangioli
 
 Vocab 
 
 CDA 
 
 TBD 
Description
Finding:

for some of the used coded element : e.g. targetSiteCode.qualifier.value the full snomed ct is referenced.

Is such a level of detail relevant for the IPS ? 
In case should we select a restricted value set for these elements ?

is this correct in this context ?

  • in case is this the way we'd like to adopt when a full code system is referenced (should we define a value set defined as the full snomed ct ?)
the same applies to other element in this template and other related templates of the result section

Suggestion:

-

Further explanation:

-

 
 
Busy
Structure Definitions (External repositories)